The client was prosecuted for driving whilst unfit through drink. The issues in the case were non-completion of the MG DD/A specimen booklet and questions were raised as to why the police were proceeding with an unfit charge (section 4) instead of excess alcohol (section 5) which relies upon a breath sample. The client was represented by Sneha Shrestha (Platinum level lawyer) at the first hearing. The charges were discontinued before the second hearing after Trevor Feehily (reviewing lawyer) raised disclosure issues with the police including interview tape and custody record.