The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (88 in breath). The issues in the case were the machine had produced two breath samples over the permitted 15% breath difference which required the officer to move to blood or urine in accordance with the MG DD/ A specimen booklet. At the trial, Oliver Connor instructed by Neil Blackaby (reviewing lawyer) persuaded the prosecution to offer no evidence as body cam footage had not been disclosed confirming the identity of the vehicle driver.