The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (199 in urine). The issues in the case were the continuity of the evidential specimen and evidence of driving. David Houldcroft instructed by Trevor Feehily (reviewing lawyer) challenged the admissibility of video footage and persuaded the prosecution to accept a guilty plea to a lesser offence of drunk in charge. This resulted in a relatively short discretionary ban instead of the mandatory 12 month disqualification.