The client was prosecuted for failing to provide specimen of breath. The issues in the case were bad faith by the police as the client had been harassed by officers over a 2 year period and he disputed the reasons for stopping his vehicle. The client also denied there was a refusal to provide the specimen. The police failed to serve the CCTV from the specimen procedure which was not listed on the schedule of unused material and therefore formed part of the prosecution case. The prosecution offered no evidence before the second hearing which was listed for trial after Laura Heywood (reviewing lawyer) wrote to the prosecution raising non-disclosure of the CCTV.