The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol. The issues included post driving alcohol consumption (hip flask defence) and mistakes in police procedure. The charges were discontinued before the second hearing which was listed for trial after written representations from Sandra Cooper (reviewing lawyer) highlighting the fact the firm had controverted the printout at the outset of the case meaning that evidence of the breath sample was inadmissible without the officer present having successfully opposed an application by the prosecution to vacate the trial.